Faust's Bargain: Charity and Government

The latest edition of Columbia includes an article by Alton J. Pelowski entitled "In Defense of Life, Love and Freedom" describing the problems when a private charity becomes dependent on public funding.  Similarly, Catholic Charities in Illinois are closing their adoption services because of new requirements to change their screening criteria to accept gay couples in order to receive government funding.

Although I empathize with their distress, American Catholics who have traditionally supported government-sponsored social programs have only themselves to blame.  Non-profit organizations who have been happy to trade arduous fund-raising for siphoning tax revenues are likewise guilty.

"Free money" is always hard to resist, but there's always a catch.  Once you've accepted the money you lose the freedom to run your organization as you like (which is why some organizations like Hillsdale College eschew public funding).

Indeed, the Catholic charities are faced with a dilemma of their own making.  If they refuse to  compromise their principles for money, they must either close their doors or return to the days when they relied on their own voluntary fund-raising efforts.  The latter option is obviously more difficult; a consequence of diverting funds from private donations to publicly mandated tax revenue.

Instead it looks like they're taking the easy option: quitting.

Gift Cards and Federal Notes for the Holidays

With little fanfare in the US, another pair of countries have announced another move away from the dollar.  China and Japan will no longer use dollars to transact between the two countries.  This follows a similar agreement between China and Russia as well as talks developing with India and Brazil.  Smaller but still notable countries making noise along those lines also include Vietnam, Qatar and Iran.  So why should we care here in America?  To understand the problem, consider the sale of Holiday gift cards...

Gift cards (like rebates) work because the merchants that issue them expect a certain percentage to never be redeemed.  Thus, they can bring in cash and never worry about giving a portion of their customers anything in return.  To crunch the numbers, merchants have made $41 billion in "free money" by selling gift cards.

This is small potatoes though.  Uncle Sam has "sold" $4.45 TRILLION to foreign countries, in exchange for real goods and services, with the hope that they never redeem their gift certificates / Federal Reserve Notes.  Three of the biggest holders of those gift cards?  You guessed it: Brazil, China and Japan.

We're still pretty safe for the immediate future, but places that need dollars to do business are slowly becoming fewer.  Eventually places that *want* dollars will also diminish.  And when that happens, everyone who has dollars is going to come shopping at the US of A to redeem their coupons, competing with domestic demand and inflating prices through the roof.

Freedom in the Market

When people say “Capitalism has failed,” mentally replace “Capitalism” with “Freedom” and then consider what they’re saying. After all, capitalist was the label used by Marxists to describe those who believed in the free market. Even “free market” is a misleading term because it conjures up an image of some separate entity acting on its own without our involvement. It would be more accurate to describe it as the freedom to act within the market, i.e.: the principle of free exchange.

Capitalism is just another word for economic freedom.

Of course those calling for the eradication of capitalism aren’t asking to give up their own freedom. They still want the right to negotiate their wages and purchase (or not purchase) products as they see fit. What they really want is the ability to negotiate other peoples wages, force others to agree to their desires, and split the tab for things that they want to have but don’t want to pay for. They’re eager to see shackles placed on others, not realizing they may wind up wearing them in the end.

“He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” - Thomas Paine